Less is more

Less is more. So said the ever-stylist Coco Chanel, so who could argue? But her philosophy applies to more than just  clothes…

The over-consumption of resources is at the heart of the sustainability challenge facing the planet. Yet we all have the power to use resources in better, more efficient ways.

Here are some top tips for being a more efficient consumer whilst at work:

  • Watch what you buy – Look for the most sustainable good or service at every opportunity. Not only are these likely to offer better value for money, it also sends a clear message to the market that sustainability is good.
  • Use less – Be careful how you use resources. Print on both sides of the paper. Choose products with less packaging. Re-use materials as much as you can. Avoid producing or using unnecessary stuff.
  • Recycle – Make sure you recycle any materials that you can. Opportunities for recycling will vary from office to office, country to country, so find out what’s going on in your area and get involved.

More sustainable consumption can result in more than an inner glow. It can lead to significant cost savings and often to more innovative approaches to work.

Many UN organizations are working hard to improve the sustainability of their procurement practices. You can see some examples on the case studies page.

Have you got any examples of ways in which you and your colleagues have improved the efficiency of your resource consumption? Or any ideas on how the UN could be better in this area? Share your thoughts below in the comments section.

Down to Earth     Switch it Off     Bon Appetit     Green Champions


Did You Know?
 

  • During the 20th century, global materials use increased eight-fold (UNEP Year Book, 2010)
  • Presently, production of internationally traded goods, vital to economic growth, accounts for approximately 30% of global CO2 emissions…The mining sector accounts for 7% of the world’s energy use, an amount projected to increase... Agricultural production accounts for 70% of the global freshwater consumption, 38% of total land use, and 14% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. (Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Consumption and Production, 2010)

Additional Materials


Reports


Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Consumption and Production (2010) This report, tries to assess the best-available science from a global perspective to identify priorities among industry sectors, consumption categories and materials. It supports international, national and sectoral efforts on sustainable consumption and production by highlighting where attention is really needed.

Marrakech Process: 3rd Public Draft (2009) The Marrakech Process is a global process to support the development of a 10-Year Framework of Programs (10FYP) on sustainable consumption and production, as called for by the WSSD Johannesburg Plan of Action. Click here, to visit the website.

Sustainable Consumption & Production: Promoting Climate-Friendly Housing Consumption Patterns (2007) The present paper focuses on the patterns and trends in energy consumption by households, the climate change impact of those patterns and trends, and policies and measures by which consumption patterns can be changed to promote sustainable development.

Videos
 

 

Not Another Nature Film from WWF on Vimeo.

Comments

Assist the great nation of Japan from the earthquake by accomplishing a tiny donation!

We need to be efficient because we need to make our climate sustainable so we can live together with harmony.Here some tips to go green.

We need to use less paper so we can conserve our forest.Its easy to use recycled materials.Use less plastic and oil because this material uses fossil fuel.We also need to halt our consumption on water and electricity.

Thank you Paul for your comments! It's nice to hear a voice out there! I wonder how many people read these pages? I must admit, I don't give them enough attention. But in general, there seems to be very little dialogue on these issues. I had heard of the possibility for staff members to buy cars free of tax, but didn't know about the petrol tax refund. I will try to find out who decides on these things, and whether any changes can be made. Any suggestions would be welcome!
I liked the idea of a voluntary surcharge on Commissary shopping to fund basic environmental awareness courses, but I doubt there would be much support for such a surcharge. The idea of training, however, is excellent. As far as I know, training courses on maintaining an environmentally-friendly workspace (which will cover, among other things, use of paper, printers and other resources) are in the pipeline and are to be made mandatory for all staff.
I'm sure many staff are willing to make positive changes, at least at work, but maybe we can all do something more active to bring those changes about. I plan to speak to the Commissary manager today about eliminating plastic bags from the Commissary altogether...since I feel the Commissary will be around for some time....At least one small step in the right direction might help! On that subject, I wonder whether the Vienna city administration plans to make the city plastic-bag-free? Vienna certainly seems keen on promoting its "green" image. I'll try to find out more...

Hi Cheryl and Paul

The focal point for UNV is Romain Kieffer. If you don't have his contact details then let me know and I'll send them to you. It might be a good first step (if you haven't done so already) to talk to Rom about your ideas and see if he can help.

Do either of you fancy becoming a Green Champion? You're exactly the sort of engaged staff we need to help build momentum. Let me know if you're up for it.

All the best

Imogen

(greeningtheblue@unep.org)

Cheryl Brooks is right. She could even have gone farther and pointed out that UN staff enjoy tax-free car purchases, a most un-green privilege, and that their average incomes are a multiple of most Austrian incomes. "Unsustainable middle class lifestyles" were identified as a major environmental problem in a UN Industrial Development Organization position paper for the Rio Conference. That's very long ago...

The least UN staff (not just in Vienna) could do is to pay a voluntary surcharge on their tax-free shopping from which training in the basics of environmental sustainability could be funded, for that is a subject most UN staff isn't very familiar with.

The Commissary at the United Nations Office at Vienna offers a range of imported goods, almost all of which are readily available at supermarkets, open-air markets and shops in Vienna. I'm convinced that the import of goods for the Commissary leaves an enormous carbon footprint, but it seems that staff members are unwilling to give the Commissary up. Vienna is not a "hardship" duty station. Many people shop at the Commissary for the perfume and alcohol that is available at prices lower than at airport duty-free shops. Is the availability of such products justified at UNOV at all?

If the UN is serious about this issue there should be an immediate end to tax-free car purchases - surely an outrage in a world where so many people lack food, water, sanitation, health care...
Few people outside the system know that UN staff have access to such perks.

Also an immediate end to the Commissary system in rich cities such as Vienna and Geneva. Why should people on above average salaries get yet more perks? This is totally unsustainable consumption (could one say greed?)

Good point. Does UN staff need duty-free shopping at all? I work at the VIC as well (as a consultant - no Commissary perks) and live in Austria - on of the high-income countries. And there is (or used to be) a petrol tax refund -of all un-green things...! Most of us earn a multiple of an Austrian citizen in a similar position. "Less is more" - maybe UN staff could do more thinking on the subject.

I once suggested, in an e-mail to the UNIDO magazine "Making It", that the least we could do would be to adopt a voluntary surcharge on Commissary shopping, out of which training courses on basic environmental issues for ALL staff could be funded. Because most of us don't know more about the environment than the average newspaper reader - and that while most of the project funding goes to environmental projects. No-one replied to the suggestion, but I say: practice what you preach!

Comment on this article

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.